VR Benchmarks

As for Virtual Reality, I love it but it is more demanding than traditional gaming. This is partially because of the resolutions needed to render for two eyes and because they render more than what is immediately visible. But also because of post effects to get the proper “fisheye” effect for it to look proper in your eyes with the HMD. You also have to have much higher expectations for frame rates in VR, skipping frames or lower FPS can cause motion sickness in VR. Because of that, I ran a few tests. 

My first test was again in Superposition. This time I tested the VR Future test using the Oculus resolution. I have also included the average frame rate as well which is important for the cards at the top of the chart because for some reason Superposition is capped at 10,000 for its scores and that doesn’t show the performance gap in those cards at the top. The QICK 319 RX 7700 XT Black and the Pulse are just 2 points off from each other here and sitting right in the middle of the overclocked RTX 4070s.

graph10

My second round of VR testing was in VRMark which has three tests that are similar to the VR tests in Superposition. I only focused on just the most demanding test called Blue Room which is looking more at future VR performance. The QICK 319 RX 7700 XT Black has a little bit of a lead on the Pulse here by 76 points which was enough to slide ahead of the RTX 3070 Ti but it is still well behind all of the RTX 4070s which is the next card up.

graph11

 

Log in to comment

We have 2468 guests and one member online

supportus