VR Benchmarks

As for Virtual Reality, I love it but it is more demanding than traditional gaming. This is partially because of the resolutions needed to render for two eyes and because they render more than what is immediately visible. But also because of post effects to get the proper “fisheye” effect for it to look proper in your eyes with the HMD. You also have to have much higher expectations for frame rates in VR, skipping frames or lower FPS can cause motion sickness in VR. Because of that, I ran a few tests.

  My first test was again in Superposition. This time I tested the VR Future test using the Oculus resolution. I have also included the average frame rate as well which is important for the cards at the top of the chart because for some reason Superposition is capped at 10,000 for its scores and that doesn’t show the performance gap in those cards at the top. The RX 7700 XT Pulse is sitting right in the middle of two different RTX 4070s. This put it out in front of the 3070 Ti and way ahead of the 4060 Ti and 6750 XT.

graph10

My second round of VR testing was in VRMark which has three tests that are similar to the VR tests in Superposition. I only focused on just the most demanding test called Blue Room which is looking more at future VR performance. The RX 7700 XT Pulse was nearly tied with the RTX 3070 Ti here with a big gap between both cards and the 4070s ahead of them and an equally large gap between them and the 6750 XT and 4060 Ti.

graph11

 

Log in to comment

We have 1482 guests and no members online

supportus