CPU Performance
To start testing off I went with a rendering-focused benchmark with the always popular Blender. I tested with the latest Blender Benchmark available 4.2 and I have all of the results stacked together so we can get the overall picture. I don’t have some of our legacy CPUs tested here, the plan was to also include Blender 4.0 results but both of the new CPUs had problems running that test leaving just these results. This does give us a look at the 285K compared to the 14900K and the 245K next to the 14600K as well. There is a good margin between the 285K and the 14900K but the 245K didn’t pull away as much when compared with the 14600K.
Continuing with the video encoding theme I also have Handbrake which is an open-source transcoder. For this test I am taking a 4k video down to 1080p 30 FPS, the results are the average FPS of that task. The Ultra 9 285K is way out in front here, with a HUGE lead over everything else tested. The Ultra 5 245K also did extremely well, running up near both the 13900K and 14900K in this test.
For the always popular Cinebench, I am testing with the older Cinebench R20 and R23 as well as the new 2024 edition as well. I always like Cinebench because we have multi-core and single-core performance which gives us a good look at the performance of the whole CPU and IPC performance. In R20 on the multi-core test, the Ultra 9 285K is up at the top with a good margin and the Ultra 5 245K was sitting at 9843 vs the 8902 of the 14600K. For the R20 single-core results the 285K was once again up at the top and the 245K moved up into the group of CPUs up at the top. For Cinebench R23 the 285K was once again at the top with plenty of room ahead. I should note however we haven’t gotten the latest Ryzen 9900X and 9950X processors which would also be competing with the 285K. The 285K leads in single-core tests here as well then the 245K is sitting ahead of the 14600K with a healthy lead, almost passing the 7900. Last up was the latest Cinebench 2024 test and its results were similar to R23. What is interesting to see in that test though is the two Ryzen 9000 Series CPUs that we have tested on the single-core results edging out in front of the 245K but the 285K is still way ahead there as well.
Next up we have ray tracing-focused rendering benchmarks. Here I tested the CPUs in POV-Ray and V-Ray including the newer V-Ray Benchmark 5. POV-Ray was also tested with a single core and across all of the cores. The Ultra 9 285K is way out in front for the multi-core test with a score of 14424 and is also in front for the single core with 911.91. The 245K finally pulled away from the 14600K enough to have a few other CPUs sitting between the two and its single-core performance was also impressive in that it caught up but didn’t pass the 13900K and 14900K with their higher clock speeds. In the old V-Ray as well as V-Ray 5 the 245K improved significantly on the performance seen with the 14600K. Interestingly the Ryzen 7950X is still the top result in the V-Ray Benchmark 5 graph which really would be interesting once we get the newest Ryzen CPUs into the mix as well. The 285K did improve significantly compared to the 14900K here, going from 24072 up to 29201.
I also tested using the CPUz’s built-in benchmark which does run on a single thread and with all threads. In the multi-thread test, the 285K improved on the 14900K by over 2000 points. The 245K saw a big jump over the 14600K as well putting it up into the range of the older flagship 12900K. For single-core performance, however, things were more interesting. Both CPUs dropped in performance in this test compared to their previous generation counterparts. The 285K is sitting behind the 14900K with a 906 to the 14900K’s 940 for example.
Next, we have wPrime which is a classic overclocking benchmark that calculates pi out to 1024 million digits and is timed. This is a multi-thread heavy test which has the older high-core count CPUs still all over the top of the charts and you can see that with the top CPUs sitting at 8 or more cores. The Ultra 9 285K scored a 46.071 which was significantly better than the 14900K but it still put it behind the top three Ryzen CPUs from last generation. The Ultra 5 245K scored 99.755 which was much better than the 173.777 of the 14600K but again still below what you would expect. This test has not gone well for any of the Intel CPUs that have e-cores but the improvements we see here are at least going in the right direction.
7 Zip is another open-source program, this time for compressing and decompressing all of your files. Here I have run the benchmark and we have three results. The combined MIPS is a combination of compressing and decompressing performance. Then I have it broken down between the two. The combined results have the Ultra 9 285K again behind the 14900K as well as the 13900K but way out in front of last generation's flagship Ryzen CPUs. The Ultra 5 245K was tied with the 8700G and behind the 14600K by a big margin as well. The decompressing and compressing graph shows us that a lot of the problem was in the decompressing performance, the 285K did outperform the 14900K and 13900K in the compressing performance there but was still behind the 7950X.
Jetstream 2 is a compilation benchmark that takes a long list of HTML5 and Java in-browser tests runs them all three times and puts together an overall score. I love this benchmark because let's be honest, most people are using their browser more than any other game or program. Jetstream gives some interesting results sometimes though but it tends to prefer high IPC or single-core performance and there are some situations where it prefers lower core-count CPUs. The two 9000 Series Ryzen CPUs are still at the top of the chart here but the Ultra 9 285K did at least improve on the performance seen by the 14900K here. The Ultra 5 245K on the other hand did much better with it having a big gap between it and the 14600K and almost matching the 14900K’s performance here.
For Passmark Performance Test I used the latest version, Performance Test 11 and also tested with the older Performance Test 10 as well. I only look at the overall CPU score which takes a few different synthetic benchmarks and combines the results to put together an overall score. This is a test that does favor multi-threaded performance over IPC. In Performance Test 10 the Ultra 9 285K is up at the top and improved on the 14900K’s score by 13.5%. The 245K jumped ahead of the 14600K but there is still a gap between it and the next fastest CPU here. For Passmark Performance Test 11 the Ultra 9 285K is at the top ahead of the 7950X3D here. I was also surprised to see it get the same score across both tests. This time it improved on the 14900K by 13.9% and the 245K bested the 14600K by 10.1%.
Crossmark is from BAPCo which also makes SYSmark and this is a cross-platform test where you can compare performance between phones and both Windows and Mac computers. This is the start of our overall PC benchmarks and Crossmark uses a mix of real-world tests to output an overall score. The 285K is up at the top here once again with a 9.1% improvement over the 14900K. The 245K did less, improving on the 14600K by 3.3%.
PCMark 10 is a great test because it tests things like video calls, browser performance, Excel, and Word performance to give an idea of real-world performance. It tends to like higher clock speeds but does take raw core count into account as well which you can see. The Ultra 9 285K struggled here, coming in right with the last generation 14900K, and with the mid-range Ryzen 7 9700X sitting up at the top it doesn’t give much hope that when we get our hands on the higher-end 9000 Series CPUs that it will even be close. I also test using the PCMark 10 Applications benchmark which uses Microsoft Office for real-world testing and here the 285K did much better, both of the new Core Ultra CPUs are up at the top here with the 245K scoring just ahead of the 14900K.
Moving the focus over towards gaming my next test is using Dolphin 5.0 Benchmark. Dolphin 5.0 is a Wii emulator and like most emulators, it doesn’t care about high core counts at all. It only runs two in total. Clock speeds are king here most of the time which is why all of the 5 GHz+ CPUs are at the top of the chart here. The Ultra 9 285K didn’t outperform the 13900K or 14900K here and has both the 9700X and 9600X from AMD ahead of it as well. The 245K was similar as well finishing the test in 188 seconds to the 183 of the 14600K.
Before diving into game testing I wanted to check out synthetic performance using 3DMark. I tested with the older DX11 Fire Strike test as well as the newer DX12 Time Spy. I also added the new 3DMark CPU Profile benchmark into the mix as well which does a good job of showing the full range of thread counts that you might see being used in games as well as a max threads option that does everything above 16 threads. In the Fire Strike test, the Ultra 9 285K was out in front here. It improved on the 14900K’s score here by 8.7%. The 245K on the other hand just barely improved on what we saw last time with the 14600K with just a 1.4% improvement. For Time Spy however the 285K was down below the 14900K and the 13900K was tied with the 12900K, this was still out in front of what the 7000 Series Ryzen CPUs did. The Ultra 5 245K was sitting ahead of the 7900 and below the 7950X3D but significantly lower than the 14600K. Then in the last test, the CPU profile of both CPUs is out in front of the last generation CPUs in all of the results.
I did of course test the two new CPUs in games as well. I will dive into testing the integrated GPU in the next section. Here though they are paired up with a powerful GPU (the RTX 4090) and I compare CPU to CPU performance. One thing is for sure, there is room for improvement here depending on what games I tested with. Some of the games like Dirt 5 saw a big performance jump coming from the 14900K to the 285K or the 14600K to the 245K but in others, performance dropped. To get a good look at it I put all of the percentages together in the table below. I suspect that there will be more improvements coming to Windows with the APO (application performance optimization) or that our results have an issue. If that is the case I will update this and dive into retesting. Intel did show that their main goals with this generation were similar performance to Raptor Lake-R with power consumption being reduced.
|
Ultra 5 245K |
Ultra 9 285K |
Dirt 5 |
17.8% |
19% |
Far Cry 6 |
0.6% |
-2.2% |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider |
8.5% |
2.2% |
Metro Exodus |
-15.5% |
8.6% |
Watch Dogs Legion |
26.2% |
13% |
Borderlands 3 |
-2.3% |
-6.6% |
Last up I also run a few tests in AIDA64, these take a look at cache performance for L1, L2, and L3 cache as well as memory speeds, Precision FLOPS, and Integer IOPS. The biggest thing I wanted to see here was how latency, especially memory latency has changed with the new design. The 14900K came in at 85 ns vs 90 for the 285K which wasn’t as bad as I expected. Single and Double precision FLOPS improved significantly, as did AES-256 performance as well.
AIDA64 |
L1 Cache Read |
L1 Cache Write |
L1 Cache Latency |
L2 Cache Read |
L2 Cache Write |
L2 Cache Latency |
L3 Cache Read |
L3 Cache Write |
L3 Cache Latency |
|
GB/s |
GB/s |
ns |
GB/s |
GB/s |
ns |
GB/s |
GB/s |
ns |
AMD Ryzen R7 2700X |
999.43 |
502.5 |
1 |
978.03 |
495.12 |
2.8 |
414.95 |
417.71 |
8.8 |
AMD Ryzen R5 2600X |
768.13 |
388.05 |
1 |
729.37 |
366.01 |
2.9 |
429.09 |
323.83 |
9.1 |
Ryzen 5 2400G |
485.01 |
238.29 |
1 |
459.8 |
232.2 |
3.1 |
222.96 |
181.6 |
9.6 |
Ryzen 3 2200G |
460.55 |
227.41 |
1.1 |
352.84 |
177.56 |
3.3 |
137.3 |
171.2 |
10.2 |
Intel i7-8700K |
1595.6 |
803.65 |
0.9 |
640.37 |
397.14 |
2.6 |
337 |
213.67 |
11 |
Intel i5-8400 |
1417.2 |
710.79 |
1 |
543.81 |
352.9 |
3.1 |
270.89 |
186.82 |
13 |
Intel Core i9-7980XE |
3758.3 |
1896.7 |
1.1 |
1671.7 |
1069.9 |
5.6 |
229.61 |
118.4 |
21 |
Intel Core i9-7960X |
3532.3 |
1785.2 |
1 |
1571.6 |
1003.5 |
5.1 |
220.22 |
121.04 |
19.8 |
Intel Core i7-7820X |
1969.9 |
995.02 |
1 |
884.63 |
574.74 |
5.6 |
114.4 |
103.57 |
19.2 |
Intel Core i5-7640X |
1044.8 |
31888 |
1 |
397.26 |
247 |
2.9 |
228.31 |
163.86 |
11.1 |
Intel Core i9-7900X |
2418.5 |
709.16 |
1 |
1037.3 |
521.94 |
5.2 |
124.16 |
106.78 |
21.2 |
Intel Core i7-7740X |
1102.7 |
561.25 |
0.9 |
424.55 |
304.3 |
2.7 |
287.01 |
186.67 |
21.2 |
Intel i7-6900K |
1963.9 |
999.59 |
1 |
710.28 |
310.34 |
4.1 |
243.96 |
195.41 |
14.6 |
Intel i7-7700K |
1114.6 |
560.82 |
0.9 |
415.45 |
285.97 |
2.7 |
234.5 |
188.7 |
10.4 |
Intel i7-5960X |
1748.5 |
874.6 |
1.2 |
623.08 |
272.77 |
3.5 |
260.72 |
184.92 |
15.3 |
AMD Ryzen R7 1800X |
917.46 |
460.16 |
1.1 |
831.95 |
446.37 |
4.7 |
388.18 |
386.01 |
12.4 |
AMD Ryzen R7 1700X |
867.89 |
435.33 |
1.2 |
809.29 |
419.38 |
5 |
369.75 |
350.31 |
12.9 |
AMD Ryzen R7 1700 |
793.9 |
398.12 |
1.3 |
742.92 |
389.73 |
5.4 |
334.36 |
332.12 |
14.2 |
AMD Ryzen R5 1600X |
689.47 |
345.95 |
1.1 |
630.99 |
334.93 |
4.7 |
386.48 |
326.86 |
12.3 |
AMD Ryzen R5 1500X |
446.84 |
224.01 |
1.1 |
306.82 |
211.58 |
11.8 |
306.82 |
211.58 |
11.8 |
AMD Ryzen R5 2600 |
685.38 |
344.05 |
1 |
669.28 |
333.5 |
3.1 |
381.16 |
320.56 |
9.8 |
AMD Ryzen R7 2700X |
849.91 |
426.09 |
1 |
837.76 |
418.75 |
3 |
357.51 |
356.71 |
9.4 |
Intel i7-8086K |
1596.4 |
803.56 |
0.9 |
623.36 |
423.53 |
2.6 |
380.04 |
243.73 |
10.9 |
Intel i9-9900K |
2375.6 |
1195.4 |
0.8 |
907.65 |
626.34 |
2.4 |
302.01 |
221.1 |
11 |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
3098.6 |
1551.4 |
0.9 |
1545.3 |
1416.8 |
2.8 |
1014.4 |
836.39 |
11.5 |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
2133.2 |
1072.9 |
0.9 |
1069.1 |
993.49 |
2.8 |
611.53 |
573.21 |
10.2 |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
1547.4 |
779.24 |
1 |
777.62 |
745.3 |
2.8 |
584.93 |
538.45 |
10.4 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3400G |
508.97 |
253.87 |
1 |
490.26 |
247.04 |
3 |
233.57 |
193.62 |
9.3 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
1080.5 |
541.5 |
0.9 |
541.84 |
530.5 |
2.7 |
322.13 |
321.33 |
11.1 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
965.85 |
484.67 |
1 |
485.55 |
460.71 |
3.1 |
374.11 |
343.53 |
11.8 |
Intel i5-10600K |
1676.6 |
840.87 |
0.8 |
662.98 |
452.67 |
2.5 |
361.35 |
238.47 |
10.5 |
Intel i9-10900K |
3162.1 |
1586.7 |
0.8 |
1201.8 |
759.97 |
2.4 |
407.66 |
245.94 |
11.4 |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
1721.4 |
869.69 |
0.9 |
851.89 |
831.97 |
2.6 |
276.24 |
298.84 |
11 |
Intel i9-11900K |
4542.8 |
2299.3 |
1 |
1413.2 |
691.62 |
2.5 |
330.32 |
213.28 |
11.4 |
Intel i5-11600K |
3412.3 |
1724.9 |
1 |
960.91 |
526.76 |
2.7 |
319.1 |
198.57 |
11.4 |
Intel i9-12900K |
2310 |
1438.7 |
1 |
1233.5 |
562.72 |
2.9 |
678.84 |
418.11 |
19.8 |
Intel i5-12600K |
1461.1 |
971.78 |
1.1 |
846.4 |
360.51 |
3.2 |
598.86 |
292.09 |
21.4 |
AMD Ryzen 5 4500 |
1561.9 |
784.1 |
1 |
785.34 |
751.61 |
2.9 |
350.05 |
571.19 |
10.5 |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
1646.6 |
831.24 |
0.9 |
832.43 |
767.22 |
2.7 |
445.8 |
437.73 |
11.9 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
2267.8 |
1157.8 |
0.9 |
1147.6 |
1026.1 |
2.6 |
501.53 |
526.11 |
11.5 |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
2722.9 |
1381 |
0.7 |
1361.1 |
1305.1 |
2.7 |
887.95 |
901.2 |
10.1 |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
1996.3 |
1019.3 |
0.7 |
1020.9 |
999.93 |
2.6 |
847.43 |
847.61 |
10.5 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
5252.2 |
2685 |
0.7 |
2615.6 |
2588.4 |
2.6 |
1293.7 |
1357.3 |
9.9 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
4042.4 |
2051.4 |
0.7 |
2008.5 |
1956.3 |
2.5 |
1278.6 |
1394.1 |
9.8 |
Intel i9-13900K |
2005.7 |
872.39 |
0.9 |
2280.2 |
851.63 |
3.7 |
1729.2 |
619.38 |
18.3 |
Intel i5-13600K |
3218.4 |
1472.5 |
1.1 |
1156 |
479.87 |
4.5 |
907.63 |
406.76 |
14.9 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
3839.2 |
2023.6 |
0.7 |
1925.5 |
1865.1 |
2.7 |
1146 |
1046.4 |
10.3 |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
2630.8 |
1333.7 |
0.8 |
1336.2 |
1298.2 |
2.9 |
826.97 |
879.08 |
10.4 |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
1898 |
963.23 |
0.8 |
964.63 |
946.49 |
2.9 |
698.77 |
690.84 |
10.8 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
4734.9 |
2518.4 |
0.8 |
2558.7 |
2422.3 |
2.7 |
1314.4 |
1376.8 |
12.5 |
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
2342.7 |
1239.1 |
0.8 |
1252.6 |
1171.8 |
3.1 |
674.02 |
703.18 |
12.8 |
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G |
2350.8 |
1228 |
0.8 |
1230.7 |
1219.8 |
2.8 |
867.87 |
893.95 |
11.4 |
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G |
1777.2 |
930.44 |
0.8 |
941.76 |
941.91 |
2.9 |
721.29 |
702.59 |
10.7 |
Intel i9-14900K |
5923.3 |
1928.7 |
0.9 |
2160.2 |
861.9 |
3.6 |
1158.8 |
540.95 |
20.7 |
Intel i5-14600K |
3525.3 |
1248 |
1 |
1310.9 |
547.83 |
3.9 |
590.43 |
359.64 |
14.8 |
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X |
3716.7 |
1942.9 |
0.7 |
1429.6 |
1469.6 |
2.6 |
805.86 |
807.74 |
11.9 |
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X |
4850.5 |
2576.9 |
0.7 |
1790.2 |
1804.4 |
2.5 |
1078.9 |
935.36 |
10.6 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K |
5719.9 |
4012.7 |
0.7 |
707.18 |
711.72 |
4 |
2387.3 |
1261 |
16.2 |
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K |
3513 |
2465.1 |
0.8 |
574.21 |
44.44 |
4.3 |
1428.4 |
664.64 |
15.3 |
AIDA64 |
Memory Read |
Memory Write |
Memory Latency |
Single-Precision FLOPS |
Double Precision FLOPS |
AES-256 |
24-bit Integer IOPS |
32-bit Integer IOPS |
64-bit Integer IOPS |
|
MB/s |
MB/s |
ns |
GFLOPS |
GFLOPS |
MB/s |
GIOPS |
GIOPS |
GIOPS |
AMD Ryzen R7 2700X |
50214 |
48578 |
65 |
507.9 |
253.9 |
70514 |
127.7 |
127.7 |
64.22 |
AMD Ryzen R5 2600X |
50273 |
48346 |
65.5 |
383.2 |
191.4 |
51932 |
95.82 |
95.82 |
48.15 |
Ryzen 5 2400G |
45967 |
47850 |
66.6 |
235.9 |
117.8 |
32388 |
58.94 |
58.98 |
29.67 |
Ryzen 3 2200G |
35567 |
36240 |
118.4 |
225.8 |
112.6 |
27603 |
56.32 |
56.32 |
28.3 |
Intel i7-8700K |
38421 |
40175 |
57.9 |
825 |
412.5 |
29406 |
370 |
370 |
51.55 |
Intel i5-8400 |
38096 |
40549 |
59.8 |
728.8 |
364.5 |
25192 |
323.5 |
323.5 |
45.55 |
Intel Core i9-7980XE |
77004 |
68888 |
73.4 |
1831 |
915.5 |
69377 |
821.2 |
821.3 |
121.6 |
Intel Core i9-7960X |
79416 |
71554 |
74.9 |
1681 |
840.6 |
65409 |
754 |
753.9 |
114.7 |
Intel Core i7-7820X |
76049 |
73759 |
71.6 |
944.9 |
472.5 |
36420 |
423.7 |
423.7 |
63.85 |
Intel Core i5-7640X |
30786 |
31888 |
68.5 |
536.5 |
268.2 |
18547 |
238.1 |
138.1 |
33.53 |
Intel Core i9-7900X |
76856 |
72856 |
72.8 |
1148 |
574.5 |
45506 |
515.1 |
515 |
79.76 |
Intel Core i7-7740X |
38455 |
40596 |
53.2 |
575.4 |
287.8 |
20503 |
258.1 |
258 |
35.97 |
Intel i7-6900K |
66786 |
68130 |
61.9 |
1023 |
511.7 |
36340 |
255.9 |
255.9 |
63.96 |
Intel i7-7700K |
38498 |
40448 |
52.7 |
575.7 |
287.9 |
20519 |
258 |
258 |
35.98 |
Intel i7-5960X |
66108 |
49545 |
62.8 |
895.5 |
447.7 |
31783 |
223.9 |
223.9 |
55.97 |
AMD Ryzen R7 1800X |
44031 |
43425 |
81.8 |
472.4 |
236.2 |
64016 |
118.1 |
118.1 |
59.03 |
AMD Ryzen R7 1700X |
44493 |
43749 |
78.3 |
446.8 |
223.4 |
61730 |
111.7 |
111.7 |
55.84 |
AMD Ryzen R7 1700 |
45343 |
43777 |
82.6 |
408.5 |
204.3 |
56811 |
102.1 |
102.1 |
51.05 |
AMD Ryzen R5 1600X |
44452 |
43918 |
83.7 |
354.9 |
177.5 |
49340 |
88.74 |
88.73 |
44.34 |
AMD Ryzen R5 1500X |
44289 |
43746 |
83.1 |
229.8 |
114.8 |
31983 |
57.43 |
57.45 |
28.72 |
AMD Ryzen R5 2600 |
50385 |
48499 |
66.5 |
351 |
175.4 |
48939 |
88.03 |
88.02 |
44.01 |
AMD Ryzen R7 2700 |
50088 |
48343 |
65.9 |
434.3 |
217.2 |
60336 |
108.6 |
108.6 |
54.68 |
Intel i7-8086K |
39069 |
40675 |
56.2 |
824.9 |
412.5 |
29397 |
369.9 |
369.9 |
51.55 |
Intel i9-9900K |
39682 |
41015 |
51.1 |
1226 |
613 |
45542 |
550 |
549.8 |
79.79 |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
53981 |
52271 |
70.7 |
1546 |
772.1 |
106943 |
385.7 |
385.7 |
96.57 |
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
51498 |
28739 |
67.3 |
1078 |
537.8 |
74474 |
271 |
271.2 |
67.77 |
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
50769 |
28736 |
68.9 |
799.5 |
400 |
55456 |
198.6 |
198.6 |
49.64 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3400G |
49936 |
53502 |
67.1 |
257.2 |
128.5 |
35736 |
64.16 |
64.16 |
32.25 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
51435 |
28743 |
66.4 |
551.6 |
276.1 |
38176 |
138.7 |
138.7 |
34.65 |
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
50246 |
28734 |
71.1 |
497.6 |
248.7 |
34946 |
124.4 |
124.4 |
31.09 |
Intel i5-10600K |
43340 |
43430 |
48.2 |
863.8 |
431.9 |
30782 |
387.2 |
386.9 |
53.99 |
Intel i9-10900K |
44972 |
43808 |
50.5 |
1632 |
815.7 |
58163 |
731.3 |
731.2 |
102 |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
50972 |
28772 |
59.2 |
891.9 |
445.8 |
61623 |
709.6 |
709.7 |
55.72 |
Intel i9-11900K |
44919 |
43343 |
51.8 |
1068 |
534.2 |
164966 |
547 |
547 |
182.7 |
Intel i5-11600K |
43953 |
43468 |
55.6 |
838.7 |
419.4 |
123767 |
429.3 |
429.3 |
143.4 |
Intel i9-12900K |
71418 |
72395 |
82 |
695.7 |
247.9 |
140499 |
400.6 |
400.6 |
166.2 |
Intel i5-12600K |
65416 |
71336 |
87.8 |
432.5 |
216.2 |
86470 |
252.7 |
252.7 |
96.22 |
AMD Ryzen 5 4500 |
52683 |
53191 |
82.8 |
806 |
402.6 |
56578 |
201.5 |
201.3 |
50.35 |
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 |
48444 |
28753 |
70.9 |
853.2 |
426.2 |
107839 |
675.8 |
679.6 |
53.38 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X |
47858 |
28760 |
68.2 |
1158 |
577.9 |
137459 |
919.1 |
912.9 |
74.38 |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
58755 |
80120 |
70 |
1392 |
694.6 |
192730 |
1205 |
1205 |
602.4 |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
54720 |
80771 |
69.5 |
1046 |
523.1 |
147661 |
912.5 |
912.5 |
456.4 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
67342 |
76712 |
69 |
2735 |
1364 |
379510 |
2370 |
2370 |
1184 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
68064 |
78123 |
67.7 |
2062 |
1029 |
288134 |
1792 |
1789 |
895.4 |
Intel i9-13900K |
76006 |
68902 |
86.1 |
2238 |
1116 |
157028 |
831.4 |
831.4 |
270.6 |
Intel i5-13600K |
64721 |
62311 |
97.2 |
1294 |
647 |
86637 |
509.5 |
509.4 |
136.4 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
73968 |
73494 |
69.4 |
2007 |
998.7 |
267499 |
1710 |
1709 |
855.9 |
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 |
58694 |
79929 |
68.9 |
1369 |
684.7 |
185084 |
1192 |
1192 |
594.3 |
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
59454 |
81467 |
69.6 |
988.6 |
494.3 |
140625 |
861.9 |
861.2 |
431.2 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
77677 |
80314 |
68.1 |
2619 |
1311 |
178269 |
2239 |
2239 |
1120 |
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
65343 |
81313 |
71.9 |
1241 |
620.3 |
89694 |
1076 |
1076 |
538.3 |
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G |
75149 |
99082 |
74.5 |
1277 |
638.1 |
88895 |
1108 |
1108 |
554.1 |
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G |
75418 |
99134 |
71.6 |
969.3 |
484.6 |
69303 |
842.7 |
843.2 |
421.4 |
Intel i9-14900K |
85919 |
76896 |
85.5 |
2462 |
1231 |
163454 |
936.6 |
937.3 |
291.6 |
Intel i5-14600K |
79924 |
77188 |
83.9 |
1407 |
703.3 |
98868 |
560.1 |
560 |
154 |
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X |
62215 |
84220 |
68.7 |
2039 |
1016 |
64063 |
1753 |
1753 |
876.8 |
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X |
62204 |
84918 |
68.7 |
2683 |
1337 |
83891 |
2297 |
2292 |
1147 |
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K |
94135 |
85518 |
90.3 |
3553 |
1756 |
248079 |
1355 |
1413 |
440.9 |
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K |
89004 |
85829 |
89.6 |
2103 |
1045 |
149961 |
784.9 |
786.1 |
267.6 |