In-Game Benchmarks

Now we finally get into the in game performance and that is the main reason people pick up a new video card. To test things out I ran through our new benchmark suite that tests 10 games at three different resolutions (1080p, 1440p, and 4k). Most of the games tested have been run at the highest detail setting and a mid-range detail setting to get a look at how turning things up hurts performance and to give an idea of if turning detail down from max will be beneficial for frame rates. In total, each video card is tested 54 times and that makes for a huge mess of results when you put them all together. To help with that I like to start with these overall playability graphs that take all of the results and give an easier-to-read result. I have one for each of the three resolutions and each is broken up into four FPS ranges. Under 30 FPS is considered unplayable, over 30 is playable but not ideal, over 60 is the sweet spot, and then over 120 FPS is for high refresh rate monitors.

So how did the RTX 4070 Ti Suprim X do when we step back and take a look at the overall playability? At 1080p it's not a surprise at all that it dominated with each of the 16 tests coming in at over 120 FPS with most of those more in the double of that range. At 1440p the RTX 4070 Ti Suprim X handled things as well with 15 out of 16 of the tests coming in at over 120 FPS, this was an improvement over the Asus TUF 4070 Ti which had two in the 60-119 FPS range. Then at 4K, you start to see the limitations of the card more with 5 still up over 120 FPS, 10 over 60 up to 119 FPS, and 1 under 60 FPS as well. The RTX 4070 Ti Suprim X improved on the TUF here as well with one test moving from the green into the orange making for one more over 120 FPS which given how close the cards perform together is surprising that with a little more of an overclock it affected these graphs at all.

graph31

graph32

graph33

Of course, I have all of the actual in game results as well for anyone who wants to sort through the wall of graphs below. To help get a look at the performance I also have a table below with the average frame rates for each card from all of our tests other than CS:GO which with its ultra-high frame rates skews the results. With both 4070 Ti’s being overclocked the gap between them wasn’t much but the Suprim X did average one more FPS across the board at 1080p and 1440p. At 1080p which is often CPU limited this put both of them up over the 7900 XT but at 1440p which has fewer CPU limited issues the 4070 Ti’s both were below the 7900 XT but out ahead of last year's flagship from Nvidia, the RTX 3090 Ti. At 4K the 3090 Ti regains the lead due to the limitations of the RTX 4070 Ti with its lower memory bus size. The game results themselves show a similar result with the 4070 Ti Suprim X holding its own well at 1440p and 1080p but falling behind some at 4K in some of the tests. All of the graphs are sorted by 1440p which makes for a few weird results when looking at 4K but 1440p is the resolution you are most likely to be using this card at.

TUF Gaming RTX 4070 Ti OC

RTX 4070 Ti Suprim X

Nvidia 3090 Ti FE

AMD RX 7900 XT

Nvidia 4080 FE

1080p

193

194

188

189

201

1440p

165

166

160

173

182

4K

103

103

106

117

126

 

graph13

graph14

graph16

graph17

graph18

graph19

graph21

graph22

graph23

graph24

graph25

graph26

graph27

graph28

graph29

graph30

 

 

Log in to comment

We have 1717 guests and no members online

supportus