Western Digital Red Drives

When we were looking for drives to test with the N5550, there was one model specifically that came to mind. Western Digital recently introduced a new series of drives made specifically for NAS called Red series drives. They shipped three of their 1Tb drives out for testing with the N5550, leaving a little room for expansion in the future but still a chance to see how the Red drives perform and hold up in a NAS environment.

So what sets the Red drives apart from everything else that Western Digital sells? First you have to understand their product lineup for consumers. Western Digital has four consumer product lines for internal drives, three of those you have most likely seen before. The Green, Blue, and Black series’ of drives all have different priorities. The Green line for example are low noise, low heat, and low power drives. They aren’t designed to be main drives; performance isn’t the priority in this case. That is exactly the opposite of their Black series drives, designed for top performance only. The Blue series drives fit in the middle between the Black and Green as a middle ground normal drive.

wdreds

As you can tell, the original three drive series’ are all focused on in PC use. The Red drives are set apart a little because they are designed specifically for NAS use. This means the Red drives have a few features that set it apart from the others. Let’s take a look at those features.

Western Digital took a few key features from their enterprise drives to give the RED drives their NAS support. Part of that is keeping the thermals and vibration down, this is especially important when you are running multiple drives close together. Here is an image that Western Digital has on their website showing the difference in thermals between a competitor and one of their Red drives. As you can see, the bearing isn’t putting out heat. This has a lot to do with reduced vibration, and putting less load on the bearing. They did this by using what they call 3D Active Balance Plus, an enhanced balance control technology.

img2 thermaliamge

Something else that sets the Red drives apart is their compatibility in NAS environments. Some of you may have run into this in the past, but the Western Digital Green drives were known for having issues in a lot of NAS and server boxes. Red drives are tested for compatibility with a list of different NAS options, you can see the full list HERE. This way you know going into it that you won’t have any issues once everything comes in. There is nothing worse than getting excited about parts coming in, only to have to wait to send them back and have new parts come in.

Another issue that you will run into when dealing with consumer drives in a NAS is problems with a RAID failing seemingly randomly. This is due to the way consumer drives handle error recovery in comparison to business class drives. To put it simply, consumer drives will attempt to correct the issue longer, locking the drive up during that time and sometimes causing the drive to drop out of the RAID. The Red drives handle this situation like enterprise drives and have a lower time allowing the RAID to react quicker and pull the info off of another drive for recovery without disrupting your computing. The Red drives are currently configured for a soft time limit of 7 seconds, but this can actually be adjusted as needed using software like smartctl.

Where things get a little fuzzy in the Red specification listing is when you go to look up the drives actual spindle speed. Typically this is how you would get an idea of the drives performance. Western Digital lists this officially as IntelliPower; this is similar to the Green series of drives that run at 5200 RPM at most. This wouldn’t be a big shock considering that the Red drives are taking a lot of the features of the much more expensive RE4 drives, having the same RPM might cut into the RE4’s market a little too much.

image 20

image 21

image 22

image 23

image 24

image 25

 

 

Log in to comment

garfi3ld's Avatar
garfi3ld replied the topic: #28490 23 Nov 2012 18:04
For those of you who aren't stuck in lines shopping, this is something that should keep you busy for a while. Enjoy!
Wingless92's Avatar
Wingless92 replied the topic: #28491 23 Nov 2012 20:57
o
garfi3ld's Avatar
garfi3ld replied the topic: #28492 23 Nov 2012 21:09
It does support 4tb drives and there are people running minecraft servers on them as mentioned in the review :)

It also supports backing up to the cloud via Amazone S3 (and other options when using after market modules)

The price is actually less than other 5 bay devices.
www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?...sNodeId=1&name=5-Bay

I also found it available for $360

www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home...&Q=&is=REG&A=details
Wingless92's Avatar
Wingless92 replied the topic: #28493 23 Nov 2012 22:37
Didn't see the Minecraft item. I wasn't saying let the server back it up to the cloud just that you should have a 3 backup system. One local, offsite and in the cloud.
L0rdG1gabyt3's Avatar
L0rdG1gabyt3 replied the topic: #28494 23 Nov 2012 22:38
On the Pros/Cons, you list the Atom processor and 2GB of ram as Pro's.

How is an Atom processor a pro in any evaluation?
Wingless92's Avatar
Wingless92 replied the topic: #28495 23 Nov 2012 22:47
Not sure, I know when I had my laptop the Atom CPU was a pile of garbage. Then again it was cheap as hell, lol. Kinda get what you pay from. It was a couple of years ago and CPU's have improved but still. I wouldn't say its a pro.

Cool that you can upgrade the memory. It just seems that it's trying to be a full windows server box and a NAS at the same time. I would much rather have it be just a NAS and be done with it.

As for other NAS boxes, people love Drobo's cause they are built like a tank and they have been proven over the years to be great at data redundancy. I would like to know what would happen with this NAS if, lets say, you had all of the drives populated, started copying stuff over to one drive and then yanked it out and stuck another drive in. I know my machine would crash and burn, lol. Would this do the same? I'm guessing so, just wondering.

I have looked at the WD Red's before I built my current WHS box but the read writes are much slower than what I wanted, but that's me.
garfi3ld's Avatar
garfi3ld replied the topic: #28496 23 Nov 2012 23:30

L0rdG1gabyt3 wrote: On the Pros/Cons, you list the Atom processor and 2GB of ram as Pro's.

How is an Atom processor a pro in any evaluation?


Low power usage yet still more than enough power to handle everything I did with the box. The D2550 Atom processor used in this NAS was only recently introduced. It is dual core and also includes hyperthreading with a clock speed of 1.86 GHz. This isn't the same Atom processor that you have used in the past, but this also isn't an extremely demanding application. You want your NAS to use very little power as well. Thats where the 10 watt TDP for the CPU comes in handy.

Wingless92 wrote: Not sure, I know when I had my laptop the Atom CPU was a pile of garbage. Then again it was cheap as hell, lol. Kinda get what you pay from. It was a couple of years ago and CPU's have improved but still. I wouldn't say its a pro.

Cool that you can upgrade the memory. It just seems that it's trying to be a full windows server box and a NAS at the same time. I would much rather have it be just a NAS and be done with it.

As for other NAS boxes, people love Drobo's cause they are built like a tank and they have been proven over the years to be great at data redundancy. I would like to know what would happen with this NAS if, lets say, you had all of the drives populated, started copying stuff over to one drive and then yanked it out and stuck another drive in. I know my machine would crash and burn, lol. Would this do the same? I'm guessing so, just wondering.

I have looked at the WD Red's before I built my current WHS box but the read writes are much slower than what I wanted, but that's me.


Also Wingless, have you had a NAS box? These are features that almost all of the companys offer in their NAS's anymore (modules and whatnot). The main thing that stands out between this and what I have seen in the past is the variety of modules that are available. You don't have to run any of the modules if you don't want to and it will still perform fine as a NAS as it sits. I'm not sure why you would be upset that a NAS has more features

This NAS and the Drobo would handle that situation the same as any other device. Pulling a drive out mid data transfer is any situation is going to end badly.
garfi3ld's Avatar
garfi3ld replied the topic: #28497 23 Nov 2012 23:35
I also should have mentioned that the Atom CPU used in the N5550 is faster than what is used in most other NAS, that is why it was a pro. On top of the low power usage.
Arxon's Avatar
Arxon replied the topic: #28498 24 Nov 2012 00:14
Been debating on getting a NAS. Are they worth getting?

We have 1419 guests and no members online

supportus